Furnishing the Last Line of Defense Fire and Gas Systems - Automation Application Furnishing the Last Line of Defense aeSolutions' family of products includes FM-approved fire and gas systems for industrial installations. The pre-engineered package is scalable and configurable to meet the client's requirements. As a last line of defense when the plant's DCS and SIS are both incapacitated by disaster, the F&G system has self-contained power for 24 hours and a standalone first responder's panel. Under normal conditions, the DCS operator may also graphically view the status of the detectors and interlocks. FM-approvals are maintained for Fire System Monitoring and Gas Monitoring and their mitigation controls within the TUV-certified SIL-rated PLC. • Fire System Monitor and Control, FM-approved for NFPA 72 conformance • Gas Monitor and Control, FM-approved for combustible gas standard 6320, toxic gas standard 6340, and ANSI/ISA 12.13.01 performance requirements • Scalable for 50 to 50,000 I/O • Listed field detection and alarm devices • FM-approved battery set and charger panel • Fire and Gas off-the-shelf product - FGS 1400 MK II Automation Services Previous Next

The start-up sequence is a predefined set of steps and conditions required to safely start up a process or system. This sequence ensures that all necessary checks and safety measures are in place before operations begin. Acronyms & Terms Glossary <- More Definitions Start-Up Sequence The start-up sequence is a predefined set of steps and conditions required to safely start up a process or system. This sequence ensures that all necessary checks and safety measures are in place before operations begin. Our Services Whitepaper: Achieving 84-92% Urgent Alarm Reduction Through Comprehensive Lifecycle Implementation: A Dual-Unit Midstream Case Study Awarded Best Paper Award at the 2025 TEES Mary Kay O'Connor Process Safety Center-TAMU (MKO) Safety & Risk Conference Abstract November 2025 — Greg Pajak, aeSolutions Senior Specialist, ICA — A midstream facility implemented a systematic alarm rationalization program across two critical units, achieving unprecedented reductions in urgent alarm loads. Unit A reduced urgent alarms from 45% to 7% (84% reduction), while Unit B decreased from 62% to 5% (92% reduction). This paper Scoping Your Industrial Project: Best Practices for Success Scoping your industrial project is more than a kickoff step—it’s the foundation for budget, schedule, and long-term success. From aligning stakeholders to pressure-testing assumptions, a dynamic scoping strategy helps prevent costly missteps, manage risks, and keep your project on track from concept to completion. Control System Migrations | Part 7 | Best Practices for Installation, Testing, & Commissioning The cutover phase is the defining moment of a control system migration, where planning meets execution. From thorough backups and pre-shutdown prep to mechanical completion and commissioning, every step must be precise. Skipping even small details can lead to costly setbacks, while disciplined execution ensures a smooth, successful transition.

Achieving a High-Risk Systems Overhaul on an Accelerated Schedule When TGES America, Ltd. needed a critical overhaul of the complex control system and instrumentation for the central utilities plant (CUP) of a specialty materials manufacturing plant, they turned to aeSolutions, a Siemens Solution Partner. Subsequently, due to the need to complete the project four months early, the planned cold cutover to the new systems had to be done as a hot cutover without disrupting production. TGES America, aeSolutions, and Siemens made it happen, much to the delight of the customer. Challenge Unreliable, legacy controls disrupting production, undermining customer trust, and triggering financial penalties. Solution Engage an expert partner to design, engineer, and install fully modern and ultra-reliable systems for CUP controls and monitoring. Results Improved margins and a repeatable reference model for TGES America — with reliable plant utilities and customer trust restored. Previous Story Next Story

The architecture or voting arrangment used in the field instrument or final control element of a safety instrumented system (SIS) to reach a certain safety integrity level (SIL). Voting logics include one-out-of-one (1oo1), 1oo2, 2oo2, 2oo3, etc. For example, a 2oo2 voting logic indicates there are two protective devices/instruments in a system and both devices (two-out-of-two) are needed to properly shut down the system or mitigate the hazard. 1oo2 indicates that only one of the devices would be required to properly prevent the situation from occurring. Acronyms & Terms Glossary <- More Definitions Voting Logic The architecture or voting arrangment used in the field instrument or final control element of a safety instrumented system (SIS) to reach a certain safety integrity level (SIL). Voting logics include one-out-of-one (1oo1), 1oo2, 2oo2, 2oo3, etc. For example, a 2oo2 voting logic indicates there are two protective devices/instruments in a system and both devices (two-out-of-two) are needed to properly shut down the system or mitigate the hazard. 1oo2 indicates that only one of the devices would be required to properly prevent the situation from occurring. Our Services Whitepaper: Achieving 84-92% Urgent Alarm Reduction Through Comprehensive Lifecycle Implementation: A Dual-Unit Midstream Case Study Awarded Best Paper Award at the 2025 TEES Mary Kay O'Connor Process Safety Center-TAMU (MKO) Safety & Risk Conference Abstract November 2025 — Greg Pajak, aeSolutions Senior Specialist, ICA — A midstream facility implemented a systematic alarm rationalization program across two critical units, achieving unprecedented reductions in urgent alarm loads. Unit A reduced urgent alarms from 45% to 7% (84% reduction), while Unit B decreased from 62% to 5% (92% reduction). This paper Scoping Your Industrial Project: Best Practices for Success Scoping your industrial project is more than a kickoff step—it’s the foundation for budget, schedule, and long-term success. From aligning stakeholders to pressure-testing assumptions, a dynamic scoping strategy helps prevent costly missteps, manage risks, and keep your project on track from concept to completion. Control System Migrations | Part 7 | Best Practices for Installation, Testing, & Commissioning The cutover phase is the defining moment of a control system migration, where planning meets execution. From thorough backups and pre-shutdown prep to mechanical completion and commissioning, every step must be precise. Skipping even small details can lead to costly setbacks, while disciplined execution ensures a smooth, successful transition.

The range within which the alarm is activated and then cleared. Dead band does not impact the setpoint upon which the alarm annunciates. aeSolutions can supply expertise at all stages of alarm management including consulting, training, and facilitating rationalization teams, followed by full design and implementation services. Acronyms & Terms Glossary <- More Definitions Hysteresis (dead band) The range within which the alarm is activated and then cleared. Dead band does not impact the setpoint upon which the alarm annunciates. aeSolutions can supply expertise at all stages of alarm management including consulting, training, and facilitating rationalization teams, followed by full design and implementation services. Our Services Whitepaper: Achieving 84-92% Urgent Alarm Reduction Through Comprehensive Lifecycle Implementation: A Dual-Unit Midstream Case Study Awarded Best Paper Award at the 2025 TEES Mary Kay O'Connor Process Safety Center-TAMU (MKO) Safety & Risk Conference Abstract November 2025 — Greg Pajak, aeSolutions Senior Specialist, ICA — A midstream facility implemented a systematic alarm rationalization program across two critical units, achieving unprecedented reductions in urgent alarm loads. Unit A reduced urgent alarms from 45% to 7% (84% reduction), while Unit B decreased from 62% to 5% (92% reduction). This paper Scoping Your Industrial Project: Best Practices for Success Scoping your industrial project is more than a kickoff step—it’s the foundation for budget, schedule, and long-term success. From aligning stakeholders to pressure-testing assumptions, a dynamic scoping strategy helps prevent costly missteps, manage risks, and keep your project on track from concept to completion. Control System Migrations | Part 7 | Best Practices for Installation, Testing, & Commissioning The cutover phase is the defining moment of a control system migration, where planning meets execution. From thorough backups and pre-shutdown prep to mechanical completion and commissioning, every step must be precise. Skipping even small details can lead to costly setbacks, while disciplined execution ensures a smooth, successful transition.

Cost-effective, safe solution for integrated Burner Management Systems (BMS) and Combustion Control Systems (CCS) uses. aeSolutions has been suppling safe and standards compliant panels for over 20 years. Jump to a Specific panel: Siemens BMS/CCS 1151 Siemens BMS/CCS 1300 Rockwell CMS 5500 aeSolutions' Custom Fabricated Panels Cost-effective, safe solution for integrated Burner Management Systems (BMS) and Combustion Control Systems (CCS) uses aeSolutions Panel Fabrication Shop 124 Woodruff Industrial Lane Greenville, SC 29607 See Our Shop: View on Youtube Panels: Developed around the Siemens SIMATIC ET200S IM151 Safety PLC, the 1151-Series Combustion Management Solution offers a cost-effective, safe solution for integrated Burner Management Systems (BMS) and Combustion Control Systems (CCS) uses. With pre-configured software and a simple touchscreen HMI, the system is easy to install and to use. Our clients enjoy a number of benefits from this totally integrated solution. Siemens BMS/CCS 1151 Features BMS is designed to meet FM 7605, IEC 61508, ISA/IEC 61511, ANSI/ISA 84.00.01, NFPA 85, NFPA 86, NFPA 87, API 556 and/or API 14C requirements for single-burner, dual-fuel combustion safeguard applications BMS is capable of meeting SIS requirements up to SIL 3 Advanced CCS firing logic is easily configured to implement a variety of fuel-saving optimization techniques that will reduce the cost of ownership while helping protect the safety of employees and the environment Interface capability to a wide variety of field sensors, analyzers, and valves Communication between combustion control systems or DCS via hardwired I/O, Profibus, Ethernet, or Modbus Designed to facilitate system functional testing HMI includes graphical display of unit operations including alarming, tuning, and diagnostic displays Master Fuel Trip (MFT) hand switch mounted on cabinet front with remote MFT option Touchscreen 10-inch HMI with automated local light-off (optional from a remote location) Preconfigured software, including customization for each application requirement Optional System Features Analog or discrete process instrumentation Free-standing or wall-mount cabinets Distributed I/O Classified area enclosure designs Local & remote alarm monitoring Fuel control valves Air damper controls Interfaces with remote I/O, VF drives, and motor controls using Profibus OPC server System Specifications CCS 1151 Processor: Siemens ET200S IM151-8 processors I/O: Siemens 131 DI Siemens 132 DO Siemens 134 AI Siemens 135 AO BMS 1151 Processor: Siemens ET200S IM151-8F processors I/O: Siemens 138-4FA DI Siemens 138-4FB DO GENERAL HMI: Siemens MP277 10” touchpad and/or Siemens distributed HMI solution. Larger screens available. Power Requirement: 120 Vac Cabinet: Painted 14 gauge steel; NEMA 12 is standard; size is application-dependent (NEMA 4 stainless steel or fiberglass optional) Area Classification: Class I, Division 2 Groups C, D Compliant With: NFPA 85, NFPA 86, NFPA 87, API 556, API 14C, ANSI/ISA 84.00.01-2004, IEC 61508, & ISA/IEC 61511 Siemens BMS/CCS 1300 Developed around the Siemens SIMATIC S7-300F Safety PLC, the 1300-Series Combustion Management Solution offers a cost-effective, safe solution for integrated Burner Management Systems (BMS) and Combustion Control Systems (CCS) uses. With pre-configured software and a simple touchscreen HMI, the system is easy to install and to use. Our customers enjoy a number of benefits from this totally integrated solution. Fe atures BMS is designed to meet FM 7605, IEC 61508, ISA/IEC 61511, ANSI/ISA 84.00.01, NFPA 85, NFPA 86, NFPA 87, API 556 and/or API 14C requirements for single-burner, dual-fuel combustion safeguard applications BMS is capable of meeting SIS requirements up to SIL 3 Advanced CCS firing logic is easily configured to implement a variety of fuel-saving optimization techniques that will reduce the cost of ownership while helping protect the safety of employees and the environment Interface capability to a wide variety of field sensors, analyzers, and valves Communication between combustion control systems or DCS via hardwired I/O, Profibus, Ethernet, or Modbus Designed to facilitate system functional testing HMI includes graphical display of unit operations including alarming, tuning, and diagnostic displays Master Fuel Trip (MFT) hand switch mounted on cabinet front with remote MFT option Touchscreen HMI with automated local light-off (optional from a remote location) Preconfigured software, including customization for each application requirement Optional System Features Analog or discrete process instrumentation Free-standing or wall mount cabinets Redundant and/or distributed I/O Classified area enclosure designs Local & remote alarm monitoring Fuel control valves Air damper controls Interfaces with remote I/O, VF drives, and motor controls using profibus System Specifications CCS 1300 Processor: Siemens S7-300 processors I/O: Siemens SM321 DI Siemens SM322 DO Siemens SM332 AI Siemens SM332 AO BMS 1300 Processor: Siemens S7-300F processors I/O: Siemens SM326F DI Siemens SM326F DO Siemens SM336F AI GENERAL HMI: Siemens MP377 12″ or 15″ touchpad and/or Siemens distributed HMI solution. Larger screens available. Power Requirement: 120 Vac Cabinet: Painted 14 gauge steel; NEMA 12 is standard; size is application-dependent (NEMA 4 stainless steel or fiberglass optional) Area Classification: Class I, Division 2 Groups C, D Compliant With: NFPA 85, NFPA 86, NFPA 87, API 556, API 14C, ANSI/ISA 84.00.01-2004, IEC 61508, & ISA/IEC 61511 Rockwell CMS 5500 Developed around the Rockwell ControlLogix platform, the Combustion Management Systems (CMS) 5500 offers a cost effective, safe solution for an integrated Burner Management Systems (BMS) and Combustion Control Systems (CCS) package. With pre-configured software and a simple touchscreen HMI, the system is easy to install and use. The system is easily adaptable to accommodate many different equipment configurations and options. Features BMS is designed to meet FM 7605, IEC 61508, ISA/IEC 61511, ANSI/ISA 84.00.01, NFPA 85, NFPA 86, NFPA 87, API 556 and/or API 14C requirements for single burner, dual-fuel combustion safeguard applications Standard BMS is capable of meeting SIS requirements up to SIL 2 (SIL 3 option is available with GuardLogix) Advanced CCS firing logic is easily configured to implement a variety of fuel-saving optimization techniques that will reduce the cost of ownership while helping protect the safety of employees and the environment Interface capability to a wide variety of field sensors, analyzers, and valves Communication between combustion control systems or DCS via hardwired I/O, Profibus, Ethernet, or Modbus Designed to facilitate system functional testing Touchscreen HMI includes graphical displays for unit operations, automated light-off, first-out alarming, tuning, and diagnostics screens Master Fuel Trip (MFT) hand switch mounted on cabinet front with remote MFT option Preconfigured software, including customization for each application requirement Optional System Features SI-BMS™ and CCS implemented as independent protection layers for added safety Remote burner light-off and alarm monitoring Multiple burner, multiple fuel applications Analog or discrete process instrumentation Redundant processors Redundant and/or distributed I/O Free-standing or wall-mounted cabinets Classified area enclosure designs Interfaces with remote I/O, VF drives, and motor controls using Ethernet, ControlNet, DeviceNet, HART or serial communications protocols Unit Operations aeSolutions has experience in applying advanced burner management and combustion controls to the following typical unit operations: Boilers TEG reboilers Glycol heaters Process heaters Furnaces and kilns Incinerators and thermal oxidizers Other process and utility fired heaters System Specifications Processor: Rockwell ControlLogix 1756-L6X series processors I/O: 120 VAC or 24 VDC digital I/O, 0-20 mA, 4-20 mA, 0-5 VDC, 0-10 VDC, +10 VDC analog I/O Diagnostic I/O cards (optional) HMI: PanelView Plus 6 series Power Req.: 120 VAC Cabinet: Painted 14 gauge steel; NEMA 12 is standard; enclosure size is application-dependent (NEMA 4 and NEMA 4X stainless steel or fiberglass optional) Area Class.: Class I, Division 2 Groups C, D Compliant With: NFPA 85, NFPA 86, NFPA 87, API 556, API 14C, ANSI/ISA 84.00.01-2004, IEC 61508, & ISA/IEC 61511 Certifications: FM-Approved SIL 2 SI-BMS BMW/CCS 1151 BMS/CCS 1300 CMS 5500 Looking for Fire and Gas panels? FGS 1400 MK II Industrial designed system, SIL 3-capable logic solver, scalable to large I/O count. Download datasheet FGS 1300 FM-approved for lower I/O count applications. Class I Division 2 area classification status. Download datasheet PS 1400 20 / 50 / 100 / 150 Power supplies that meet NFPA 72 requirements. The power you need, when you need it. Download datasheet : PS 1400 20A - PS 1400 50A - PS 1400 100A PS 1400-20-DIV2 Battery set FM-listed for Class I Division 2 areas. Rugged and reliable. Download datasheet

A collective term used to describe different types of control systems (e.g., SCADA, DCS, etc.) and associated instrumentation, which include the devices, systems, networks, and controls used to operate and/or automate industrial processes. For advanced control systems, aeSolutions process control specialists solve problems with Advanced Regulatory Control (ARC) when single variable PID control is not adequate. Cascade, feed forward, ratio, Smith predictor, and override controls are standard methods to include an additional process variable in PID loops to compensate for process dead time, or non-linearity. Multivariable and model-based controls are employed for more complex process automation challenges encountered in chemical plants and refineries. Acronyms & Terms Glossary <- More Definitions Industrial Control Systems A collective term used to describe different types of control systems (e.g., SCADA, DCS, etc.) and associated instrumentation, which include the devices, systems, networks, and controls used to operate and/or automate industrial processes. For advanced control systems, aeSolutions process control specialists solve problems with Advanced Regulatory Control (ARC) when single variable PID control is not adequate. Cascade, feed forward, ratio, Smith predictor, and override controls are standard methods to include an additional process variable in PID loops to compensate for process dead time, or non-linearity. Multivariable and model-based controls are employed for more complex process automation challenges encountered in chemical plants and refineries. Our Services Whitepaper: Achieving 84-92% Urgent Alarm Reduction Through Comprehensive Lifecycle Implementation: A Dual-Unit Midstream Case Study Awarded Best Paper Award at the 2025 TEES Mary Kay O'Connor Process Safety Center-TAMU (MKO) Safety & Risk Conference Abstract November 2025 — Greg Pajak, aeSolutions Senior Specialist, ICA — A midstream facility implemented a systematic alarm rationalization program across two critical units, achieving unprecedented reductions in urgent alarm loads. Unit A reduced urgent alarms from 45% to 7% (84% reduction), while Unit B decreased from 62% to 5% (92% reduction). This paper Scoping Your Industrial Project: Best Practices for Success Scoping your industrial project is more than a kickoff step—it’s the foundation for budget, schedule, and long-term success. From aligning stakeholders to pressure-testing assumptions, a dynamic scoping strategy helps prevent costly missteps, manage risks, and keep your project on track from concept to completion. Control System Migrations | Part 7 | Best Practices for Installation, Testing, & Commissioning The cutover phase is the defining moment of a control system migration, where planning meets execution. From thorough backups and pre-shutdown prep to mechanical completion and commissioning, every step must be precise. Skipping even small details can lead to costly setbacks, while disciplined execution ensures a smooth, successful transition.

De-energization is the process of removing or disconnecting electrical power from equipment or circuits to ensure safe maintenance or to prevent accidental startup. It is a critical safety step to protect personnel from electrical hazards. Acronyms & Terms Glossary <- More Definitions De-energization De-energization is the process of removing or disconnecting electrical power from equipment or circuits to ensure safe maintenance or to prevent accidental startup. It is a critical safety step to protect personnel from electrical hazards. Our Services Whitepaper: Achieving 84-92% Urgent Alarm Reduction Through Comprehensive Lifecycle Implementation: A Dual-Unit Midstream Case Study Awarded Best Paper Award at the 2025 TEES Mary Kay O'Connor Process Safety Center-TAMU (MKO) Safety & Risk Conference Abstract November 2025 — Greg Pajak, aeSolutions Senior Specialist, ICA — A midstream facility implemented a systematic alarm rationalization program across two critical units, achieving unprecedented reductions in urgent alarm loads. Unit A reduced urgent alarms from 45% to 7% (84% reduction), while Unit B decreased from 62% to 5% (92% reduction). This paper Scoping Your Industrial Project: Best Practices for Success Scoping your industrial project is more than a kickoff step—it’s the foundation for budget, schedule, and long-term success. From aligning stakeholders to pressure-testing assumptions, a dynamic scoping strategy helps prevent costly missteps, manage risks, and keep your project on track from concept to completion. Control System Migrations | Part 7 | Best Practices for Installation, Testing, & Commissioning The cutover phase is the defining moment of a control system migration, where planning meets execution. From thorough backups and pre-shutdown prep to mechanical completion and commissioning, every step must be precise. Skipping even small details can lead to costly setbacks, while disciplined execution ensures a smooth, successful transition.

Approving the Configurations Simulation and Factory Acceptance Testing Approving the Configurations aeSolutions builds process simulation test beds to prove that controls and operator interfaces will function in accordance with project requirements. A FAT plan with checklists lets the client's representatives test every loop and HMI screen against the software design specifications. Quality of workmanship can be reviewed. Punch list items are resolved before shipping the system. aeSolutions offers multiple options for FAT simulation: Option 1. Simulation panels hardwired to the real system I/O cards to emulate field devices. Option 2. Simulation logic configured in the real controllers while ignoring real I/O racks. Option 3. Simulation computers that interface to the real controller's I/O bus in place of the real I/O racks Option 4. Simulation platforms that emulate the real controllers and I/O (for testing logic configurations without controller hardware). Automation Services Previous Next

Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) is the computational software simulation of fluid-flow phenomena. It uses applied mathematics, physics, and numerical analysis to generate 3D models that can help visual the flow of gas or liquid. aeSolutions uses CFD for modeling to determine consequences of an accidental release for facility siting or hazard scenarios. It is also used for gas detection sensor placement as an alternative method to the Graphical Approach that justifies a more accurate number and placement of combustible and toxic gas detectors. Acronyms & Terms Glossary <- More Definitions Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) is the computational software simulation of fluid-flow phenomena. It uses applied mathematics, physics, and numerical analysis to generate 3D models that can help visual the flow of gas or liquid. aeSolutions uses CFD for modeling to determine consequences of an accidental release for facility siting or hazard scenarios. It is also used for gas detection sensor placement as an alternative method to the Graphical Approach that justifies a more accurate number and placement of combustible and toxic gas detectors. Our Services Whitepaper: Achieving 84-92% Urgent Alarm Reduction Through Comprehensive Lifecycle Implementation: A Dual-Unit Midstream Case Study Awarded Best Paper Award at the 2025 TEES Mary Kay O'Connor Process Safety Center-TAMU (MKO) Safety & Risk Conference Abstract November 2025 — Greg Pajak, aeSolutions Senior Specialist, ICA — A midstream facility implemented a systematic alarm rationalization program across two critical units, achieving unprecedented reductions in urgent alarm loads. Unit A reduced urgent alarms from 45% to 7% (84% reduction), while Unit B decreased from 62% to 5% (92% reduction). This paper Scoping Your Industrial Project: Best Practices for Success Scoping your industrial project is more than a kickoff step—it’s the foundation for budget, schedule, and long-term success. From aligning stakeholders to pressure-testing assumptions, a dynamic scoping strategy helps prevent costly missteps, manage risks, and keep your project on track from concept to completion. Control System Migrations | Part 7 | Best Practices for Installation, Testing, & Commissioning The cutover phase is the defining moment of a control system migration, where planning meets execution. From thorough backups and pre-shutdown prep to mechanical completion and commissioning, every step must be precise. Skipping even small details can lead to costly setbacks, while disciplined execution ensures a smooth, successful transition.

SIL Verification is the process of confirming that a Safety Instrumented Function (SIF) meets its required Safety Integrity Level (SIL). This involves testing and analysis to ensure that the SIF will perform reliably under specified conditions. Acronyms & Terms Glossary <- More Definitions SIL Verification SIL Verification is the process of confirming that a Safety Instrumented Function (SIF) meets its required Safety Integrity Level (SIL). This involves testing and analysis to ensure that the SIF will perform reliably under specified conditions. Our Services Whitepaper: Achieving 84-92% Urgent Alarm Reduction Through Comprehensive Lifecycle Implementation: A Dual-Unit Midstream Case Study Awarded Best Paper Award at the 2025 TEES Mary Kay O'Connor Process Safety Center-TAMU (MKO) Safety & Risk Conference Abstract November 2025 — Greg Pajak, aeSolutions Senior Specialist, ICA — A midstream facility implemented a systematic alarm rationalization program across two critical units, achieving unprecedented reductions in urgent alarm loads. Unit A reduced urgent alarms from 45% to 7% (84% reduction), while Unit B decreased from 62% to 5% (92% reduction). This paper Scoping Your Industrial Project: Best Practices for Success Scoping your industrial project is more than a kickoff step—it’s the foundation for budget, schedule, and long-term success. From aligning stakeholders to pressure-testing assumptions, a dynamic scoping strategy helps prevent costly missteps, manage risks, and keep your project on track from concept to completion. Control System Migrations | Part 7 | Best Practices for Installation, Testing, & Commissioning The cutover phase is the defining moment of a control system migration, where planning meets execution. From thorough backups and pre-shutdown prep to mechanical completion and commissioning, every step must be precise. Skipping even small details can lead to costly setbacks, while disciplined execution ensures a smooth, successful transition.

ANSI / ISA-18.2-2009 is the alarm management standard of ISA for process industries. It addresses the development, design, installation, and management of alarm systems. Acronyms & Terms Glossary <- More Definitions ANSI ISA-18.2-2009 ANSI / ISA-18.2-2009 is the alarm management standard of ISA for process industries. It addresses the development, design, installation, and management of alarm systems. Our Services Whitepaper: Achieving 84-92% Urgent Alarm Reduction Through Comprehensive Lifecycle Implementation: A Dual-Unit Midstream Case Study Awarded Best Paper Award at the 2025 TEES Mary Kay O'Connor Process Safety Center-TAMU (MKO) Safety & Risk Conference Abstract November 2025 — Greg Pajak, aeSolutions Senior Specialist, ICA — A midstream facility implemented a systematic alarm rationalization program across two critical units, achieving unprecedented reductions in urgent alarm loads. Unit A reduced urgent alarms from 45% to 7% (84% reduction), while Unit B decreased from 62% to 5% (92% reduction). This paper Scoping Your Industrial Project: Best Practices for Success Scoping your industrial project is more than a kickoff step—it’s the foundation for budget, schedule, and long-term success. From aligning stakeholders to pressure-testing assumptions, a dynamic scoping strategy helps prevent costly missteps, manage risks, and keep your project on track from concept to completion. Control System Migrations | Part 7 | Best Practices for Installation, Testing, & Commissioning The cutover phase is the defining moment of a control system migration, where planning meets execution. From thorough backups and pre-shutdown prep to mechanical completion and commissioning, every step must be precise. Skipping even small details can lead to costly setbacks, while disciplined execution ensures a smooth, successful transition.