August 2025 – By Chris Neff, PMP — When planning your industrial project, a well-defined scope isn’t just a preliminary step — it’s the quintessence of getting your budget, schedule, and project lifecycle established. Done right, scoping helps teams prevent costly overruns, delays, and mismanaged resources. Yet, with competing priorities and complex cross-functional needs, critical aspects of the scoping process often do not receive the attention needed for setting a strong foundation, leaving projects vulnerable to avoidable risks. To address these challenges, implementing a clear project development plan — grounded in best practices — can ensure that scoping is comprehensive and realistic, supporting projects from concept to completion. Below are best practices to build an industrial project scoping strategy. Recognize That Scoping is a Dynamic Process Industrial project scoping isn’t a one-and-done static activity. It’s a dynamic, process that evolves as new information becomes available. It is normal for needs to shift over a project’s lifecycle as functional demands, regulatory requirements, and resource availability changes. Scoping requires teams to regularly revisit and refine an initial project plan, ensuring that organizations remain adaptable in addressing unforeseen challenges incorporating improvements as the project progresses. It’s about a sequence for validations, preventing the likelihood of jumping to conclusions. Implementing Progressive Scoping Reviews To establish a process for your project lifecycle, it’s beneficial to integrate scoping reviews into project milestones. This could mean revisiting the scope after each major phase, such as design, procurement, and initial implementation, or conducting scope checks in response to significant operational or environmental changes. Regular scoping reviews provide an opportunity to validate assumptions, assess performance against key metrics, and adjust for any emerging risks. A Practical Case Study In one case study example, a large industrial client was going through an equipment modernization project that aimed to upgrade multiple thermal oxidizers, incinerators, fired heaters, and boilers. The project’s complexity was compounded by the need to ensure each component adhered to rigorous safety and functional standards. Unfortunately, the initial project scoping had not adequately accounted for cross-functional collaboration, which led to disconnects between design and implementation. Furthermore, the scoping had failed to consider the long-term maintenance requirements necessary to keep the newly modernized systems sustainable. This misalignment in the early stages could have resulted in costly project revisions if the issue hadn’t been caught before detailed design work began. By bringing in additional expertise and refocusing on an aligned scoping strategy, the team was able to avoid these potential pitfalls, highlighting the importance of accurate and comprehensive scoping from the outset. This case exemplifies how asking the right questions early can illuminate critical needs that might otherwise go unnoticed, ensuring that projects are not only feasible but also optimized for a successful project lifecycle Ultimately, a dynamic approach transforms scoping from a preliminary task into an integral part of project success, ensuring each phase builds towards a cohesive, sustainable outcome. Ensure That Your Organizational Culture is Ready For project scoping to truly succeed, an organization’s culture must be primed to support it. This involves fostering a collaborative, integrated, and prioritized approach that connects the organization’s broader objectives and engages all necessary stakeholders. Three guiding concepts, collaboration, integration, and prioritization, are essential to building a resilient project scope that can adapt to changes and overcome the inevitable challenges that arise in complex industrial projects. ·         Collaboration  ensures that all relevant stakeholders have a voice in defining project requirements and identifying potential risks early. This open communication creates a shared understanding of project goals and constraints, reducing misunderstandings and aligning team efforts. ·         Integration  means that the project scope is aligned with broader organizational objectives, such as safety, efficiency, and regulatory compliance. By embedding these goals within the project’s core framework, teams create a unified roadmap that guides decision-making across all stages. ·         Prioritization  helps teams focus on the most critical tasks, especially when resources or timelines are tight. By ranking tasks based on their impact on safety, budget, and schedule, a prioritized approach ensures that the project remains on track and adaptable, even when unforeseen challenges arise. This alignment between culture and process not only enhances the success of individual projects but also reinforces a disciplined, goal-oriented mindset across the organization. Ask the Right Questions to Pressure Test Your Assumptions A well-defined project scope requires more than initial assumptions, it demands a thorough examination of expertise, processes, collaboration, feasibility, and objectives. By asking the right questions, organizations can pressure-test their assumptions and build a scope that anticipates challenges, leverages the right expertise, and aligns with measurable goals. Below are five critical questions to guide an effective scoping process. 1. Do You Have the Right Expertise on Board? Organizations often underestimate the expertise needed for industrial projects. Are the right people in the right rooms and integrated into the right discussions? Before beginning a project, it’s important for team leaders to carefully evaluate whether internal groups would benefit from the addition of consultants to supplement the effort. During the scoping stages of a project, the right expertise can help widen the aperture of an organization’s field of view — which leads to a higher integrity outcome downstream. 2. What Discovery Steps Are Essential for a Detailed Plan? Project scoping will typically begin with a planned set of discovery activities. However, a common mistake is a lack of coordination between efforts, in addition to improper documentation. Even though things are getting done, the order of operations may be suboptimal. The solution is to establish a clear set of steps that produces a detailed plan before the discovery process commences. Typically, a well-formed discovery process entails: ·         In-depth interviews and workshops  with stakeholders such as project sponsors, end-users, operators, and maintenance staff, in addition to workshops and meetings to facilitate open discussion. ·         Functional reviews to examine existing processes, systems, and workflows to identify inefficiencies, bottlenecks, and areas for improvement. ·         Technical evaluations  to help assess equipment, infrastructure, and technology. ·         Regulatory compliance checks , which involve reviewing applicable regulations, standards, and compliance requirements. ·         Objectives-setting and outcome mapping, which connects the organization’s goals to specific organizational objectives. ·         A comprehensive hazard analysis  to identify potential risks that could impact the project. The final stage of the discovery process is to develop a comprehensive project development plan and path to execution. 3. How Will Collaboration Continue Beyond Discovery? Collaboration begins in discovery and continues throughout the project lifecycle. Successful projects require continual input, buy-in, and feedback from stakeholders ranging from engineers to managers, team leaders, process experts, and executives. However, organizations are typically navigating heavy time and resource constraints, which can make stakeholder involvement a challenge. In these situations, the key is to incorporate the right expertise at carefully defined touchpoints. One way to develop an integration protocol is to understand how each stakeholder is impacted from the project. What will be the ongoing maintenance requirements? How will responsibilities shift? In terms of development, it is important to clarify expectations and collaboration parameters upfront. 4. Is the Development Plan Realistic and Achievable? The development plan should include: ·         A clear statement of goals and the desired outcomes to be achieved ·         A review of all complex regulatory and safety requirements ·         A clear, detailed, and precise scope definition that specifies all deliverables, tasks, and milestones ·         A resource allocation strategy that encompasses all personnel, equipment, and budget considerations needed for the successful execution of the project ·         A development schedule including documentation and approval steps that outline stakeholder participation ·         Roles and responsibilities to appropriately allocate the tasks to qualified resources Depending on the project, it may be necessary to create multiple options for comparison. Comparative analysis can help to evaluate the practicality and viability of the options from a technical, financial, and functional perspective to ensure the optimal path forward. 5. Are Your Goals Comprehensive and Measurable? Comprehensive and measurable goals are essential for the success of any industrial project, particularly if a scoping process necessitates a changing roadmap. To make goals measurable, each objective should have specific metrics or milestones that can be tracked and assessed over time. This allows project leaders to monitor progress, make informed adjustments, and hold teams accountable for delivering results. By setting goals that are both comprehensive and measurable, organizations can better manage resources, anticipate challenges, and achieve long-lasting project outcomes. Goals should address all critical aspects of the project, from safety and functional efficiency to regulatory compliance and cost-effectiveness. Connecting the Dots When Scoping Your Industrial Project By adopting these best practices and committing to a structured scoping process, industrial organizations can drive projects toward success with greater clarity, adaptability, and alignment with their strategic goals. Scoping effectively means more than meeting initial requirements; it requires ensuring that every stage of a project is aligned with evolving organizational needs and external demands. This integrated approach allows teams to navigate complex challenges, manage risks, and optimize resources throughout the project lifecycle. Ultimately, a well-defined and dynamic scoping strategy is the foundation for project lifecycle success. The process begins with ensuring your organizational culture is ready to ask the right questions early on. …And If You’re Having Trouble Connecting the Dots Scoping an industrial project is no small feat. But even with the best intentions, many organizations find that they lack the internal capacity or expertise to fully implement the strategies we’ve shared.   If your team recognizes the value in these best practices but lacks the bandwidth or technical proficiency to execute them effectively, engaging external expertise could help bridge the gap.   Working with a comprehensive project development solutions provider like aeSolutions  can help you connect the dots between your goals and execution. By partnering with an experienced project development provider, you can reduce risks, optimize resources, and achieve a cohesive, goal-oriented outcome without overstretching your team.   Scoping your project is paramount to its success, and having the right expertise to support you at every step can make all the difference. If you're ready to enhance your project’s potential, consider reaching out to a trusted partner to help you navigate the path forward with confidence.

Introduction | Control System Migrations | Part 7 | Cutover, Commissioning, and the Final Push August 2025 — by Tom McGreevy, PE, PMP, CFSE — Welcome to part 7 of our Control Systems Migration blog series . In this installment, we’ll be covering the cutover phase, which is where it all comes together. This is the point where months or even years of preparation culminate in the actual replacement of the old control system with the new. It’s a high-stakes, high-pressure moment, and one where success is determined by how well you’ve planned, documented, and executed. The term “ cutover ” covers everything from physical equipment replacement to software commissioning and testing. It’s not just about wiring panels; it’s about making sure every step, from demo drawings to site acceptance testing, is aligned and accounted for. Do I Need to Begin with a Full System Backup? The short answer: Absolutely . Before any equipment is touched, every element of the current system must be backed up. That includes program logic, Human Machine Interface  (HMI) configurations, and current “ as-found ” drawings. Photos of panel internals and field installations can also be valuable, not just as references in case you need to troubleshoot, but as a last-resort rollback option if something unexpected forces you to pause or reset the transition. In a rip-and-replace scenario, rolling back may not be feasible, but having a complete picture of the system you’re decommissioning can still help solve problems when they arise during construction or testing. What Should I Include in a Cutover Execution Plan? Your cutover execution plan should be specific and clearly documented. It must describe step by step how the cutover will proceed and clarify who’s responsible for each task. It should also detail what tools, drawings, resources, and timing are required for each stage. This plan should leave no room for ambiguity. What’s happening to each wire? Which devices stay, which go? Are there mystery components, the purpose and disposition of which is not 100% understood? Those need to be resolved before the first wire is lifted, or if not, at least addressed as part of your early cutover activities. Most importantly, there is significant value in making sure this plan is in the hands of the right people. Having a perfectly crafted set of work packages and drawings means nothing if the team in the field doesn’t have them. This kind of breakdown in communication is surprisingly common, but fortunately, it is also completely avoidable. What Pre-Shutdown Work Should Be Done Before a Control System Migration? Any construction or staging work that can be done before the shutdown should already be complete. This includes routing and tagging cables, installing panels where possible, staging materials, and setting up temporary facilities like backup power in accordance with OSHA safety guidelines . If it can be done early, do it early. This will reduce the pressure during actual outage windows and create space to address the unexpected. The Details Matter — Down to the Wire One of the most critical aspects of a successful cutover is understanding where every single  wire goes and what it does. If wires aren’t clearly labeled, properly documented, or tied to an understood function, you risk losing control over the tactical situation very quickly. Similarly, you must know the purpose and disposition of every field device. Is it being reused, replaced, or removed? Has it been tagged and labeled correctly? These details feed directly into the accuracy of your demo drawings and revised documentation, which in turn drives construction confidence and efficiency. Even the basics, like wire sizes, must be documented. Tasks like these may seem like a small detail, but mismatched or unlabeled wire sizes can lead to serious setbacks during installation. Construction Documents vs. Loop Sheets It’s also worth noting that loop sheets, while useful for function testing and configuration, are not  construction documents. Teams need full demo drawings, updated termination diagrams, and accurate cable schedules to perform field work efficiently. Relying on loop sheets for installation will almost certainly slow the progress and may invite error and confusion. Mechanical Completion: Knowing When You’re Ready Before applying power to the new system, everyone involved must agree on what defines mechanical completion. At this point, all installation work should be finished, verified, and supported by construction assurance documentation. It’s a formal milestone that marks the transition from building the system to bringing it to life. Assurance activities in support of demonstration of Mechanical Completion include visual inspections, comparison to approved drawings, wiring continuity checks, and proper ground measurements (of both safety and signal ground). Site Acceptance Testing, Commissioning, and Function Checks Once mechanically complete, the system undergoes site acceptance testing  (SAT) the first time it’s powered on in its new environment. This phase confirms that nothing was damaged during shipping or installation, and that devices are behaving as expected at a basic level. From there, teams move into loop checks, verifying that inputs and outputs are correctly wired and responsive. These checks ensure that transmitters, control valves , and I/O points communicate properly with the system and that grounding is correct. This may also include bumping of motors for those motors controlled by the system, and verification of good communications to any and all third-party devices. It is critical that EVERY I/O device that had its wiring touched during the cutover be checked, to give high confidence in wiring integrity and to enable efficient functional testing. Finally, functional testing begins. Depending on the system, this could include “ water runs ,” simulation of Safety Instrumented Functions  (SIFs), and validation of interlocks . Every step should follow a documented test plan, not just for consistency, but to ensure accountability and traceability. The temptation to rush through these tests can be strong, especially during time-constrained shutdowns. But skipping steps here can have serious consequences, ranging from costly mistakes to safety hazards and legal liabilities. The Takeaway The cutover process is considered the most visible and intense phase of a control system migration. It’s where all the planning, documentation, and collaboration either pay off or fall short. When executed well, the cutover is a moment of accomplishment, the grand finale of your migration efforts. But without discipline, rigor, and proper preparation, it can quickly become chaotic, stressful, and, worst of all, dangerous to equipment and people This phase rewards diligence, not improvisation. Success lies in backing up thoroughly, planning clearly, assessing and addressing risk, labeling accurately, executing deliberately, and testing without compromise. If all of that is in place, your team can move forward with confidence, and your process can start up on a solid, resilient foundation .

Introduction | When “Just Fix It” Isn’t That Simple July 2025 — by Emily Henry, PE (SC) , CFSE, Functional Safety Group Manager — This blog is the second installment in our PHA Recommendation Playbook series , which is intended to help Process Safety, EHS, and facility managers overcome the common challenges they face when trying to close Process Hazard Analysis recommendations. If you missed Part 1, we explored how staffing and budget limitations create obstacles  that can stall even the most straightforward resolutions. In this article, we’re focusing on a challenge that doesn’t always get the attention it deserves: technical complexity . While some recommendations from a PHA might seem routine at first glance, others involve engineering considerations, system interdependencies, or implementation feasibility that turn them into long-haul capital project efforts. These complications can extend gap closure timelines, inflate costs, and even introduce new risks if not addressed with requisite knowledge and intentionality. Technical Challenges in PHA Recommendations | What Makes Them So Complex? Technical complexity refers to the engineering depth, system interdependencies, or feasibility issues that complicate the implementation of PHA recommendations . In industrial environments, this might include design changes that require coordination between multiple engineering disciplines, recommendations that call for feasibility studies, or changes to safety instrumented systems that necessitate revalidation. Sometimes, the complexity lies in hidden system dependencies, meaning that fixing one issue inadvertently introduces another. Compatibility concerns also surface, particularly when legacy systems aren’t designed to accommodate newer technology. Complicating matters further, many of these challenges aren’t fully apparent during the PHA session itself. A recommendation may seem simple on the surface — “install a relief valve”  or “update control logic” — but as the team attempts to move forward with recommendation implementation, the depth of technical complexity becomes clear. The Compliance Cost of Complexity | What Are the Risks of Unresolved PHA Recommendations? Delays caused by technical complexity come with consequences. Regulatory expectations require timely closure of PHA recommendations or, at the very least, well-documented justifications for delays. Facilities that fail to address these recommendations in a structured way may face unexpected audit findings, regulatory scrutiny, or even fines. Beyond compliance, unresolved technical items can increase safety risks. A partially implemented fix or an unaddressed hazard can lead to new vulnerabilities or process weaknesses. From an operational standpoint, unresolved recommendations may lead to unplanned downtime, deferred maintenance, or extended outage windows. Over time, these delays can cause friction between departments and erode trust in the process. How Should You Navigate Complex Technical PHA Recommendations Internally? Handling complex recommendations starts with engaging the right people early. Engineering, operations, maintenance, and safety teams must be aligned on what’s practical, what’s required, and what constraints exist. Cross-functional collaboration is essential for identifying implementation barriers before a plan is set in motion. Conducting feasibility reviews internally can reveal potential problems with space, access, process compatibility, or cost. These reviews don’t have to be overly formal, but they should be consistent and thorough enough to inform the feasibility of implementation of the recommendation at a high level. Documenting known interdependencies also helps ensure one recommendation doesn’t inadvertently conflict with another. Instead of treating each recommendation as a siloed task, consider how they fit into the broader operational strategy. Iterative planning, where adjustments are made as new information surfaces, can help prevent bottlenecks and avoid over-committing resources. When Does Technical Complexity Require External Expertise? There are times when a PHA recommendation goes beyond internal capacity, whether due to staffing limitations or the depth of technical expertise required. Yet not all third-party support is created equal. Some firms deliver a report and walk away, leaving your team with a list of action items and little else in the form of background education. Working with an experienced third-party can change the dynamic. The right partner doesn’t just identify risks; they help you engineer prioritized solutions that are feasible, effective, and aligned with your facility’s operations. A third-party familiar with system interdependencies can offer practical mitigation strategies that don’t introduce new problems elsewhere. Execution also matters. A partner that provides project management oversight can track progress, maintain accountability, and deliver documentation that supports audit defensibility. By helping prioritize what matters most and sequencing efforts strategically, an experienced partner can support smarter capital planning and more efficient implementation. Collaboration with a third-party should never feel like you’re relinquishing control. Instead, it should feel like gaining clarity with a clear line of sight from risk to resolution, with results your team can stand behind. What Are Proactive Strategies to Minimize Technical Implementation Risks? Managing technical complexity isn’t only about reacting once a challenge appears. Many of the difficulties associated with implementation can be mitigated through proactive planning. Three core proactive strategies include: Integrating front-end engineering and risk assessment into your safety processes. This helps identify potentially complex recommendations earlier in the lifecycle. Flagging technically intensive items during the PHA itself or revalidation workshops, so that additional analysis can be scoped and scheduled. Allocating budget and time for follow-up studies, such as feasibility analyses, LOPA updates, or HAZOP reviews, when recommendations involve significant system changes. Maintaining clear documentation is also essential. It not only aids internal decision-making but strengthens your position during audits or external reviews. Finally, it helps to reframe these efforts not just as compliance tasks but as opportunities to improve long-term reliability and operational resilience of your facility. From Risk to Resilience | Technical PHA Resolution Isn’t Just a Fix—It’s a Foundation Facilities that manage technical complexity well don’t just avoid problems, they build stronger, safer operations. When engineering, safety, and operations teams work together to resolve complex PHA recommendations, the resulting improvements often go beyond the immediate fix. Systems become more reliable. Cross-team collaboration improves. Equipment failures and unplanned outages decrease. Moreover, facilities gain stronger footing in the face of audits or regulatory reviews. Well-documented resolutions with traceability to risk assessments show diligence and intent, both of which matter when follow-up questions are asked. When resolutions are handled with care, the outcome shouldn’t feel like a temporary workaround. It should feel like progress. The Takeaway | Moving from Technical Complexity to Technical Confidence Technical complexity is one of the more nuanced challenges in PHA recommendation resolution. It’s also one of the easiest to underestimate. The surface-level simplicity of a recommendation often belies the engineering coordination, feasibility analysis, and systems thinking required to see it through. By planning ahead, involving the right teams, and knowing when to seek experienced, third-party expertise , your facility can navigate even the most intricate recommendations without losing momentum. And when you do choose to bring in third-party support, working with a team that understands engineering, project delivery, and compliance can be the difference between checking a box and building something truly defensible. At its best, technical resolution doesn’t just close a gap, it builds a stronger foundation. From risk to resilience, the path is clearer when the process is collaborative, strategic, and informed.

aeSolutions offers performance-based process safety engineering, fired equipment, and automation solutions with proven processes that ensure consistent project execution, while helping customers optimize safety, quality and production. We are committed to providing engineering services that Our Story Over 25 years ago, the founders of aeSolutions had a vision of doing great things in a very different way with a very different approach. That vision lives on today, to create a highly talented and engaged team passionately driven to solve the very real and very difficult challenges our industrial clients face. We are so proud of the progress we’ve made towards that vision. Over the course of time, we have steadily built a team that organizations depend on to view their problems holistically and create long-term sustainable and resilient solutions. Every day, we work on problems that matter to industrial asset owners and to their local communities. These are complex problems that are only overcome by having a great team. Today, aeSolutions is where every stakeholder is supported to pursue their full potential. All leaders recognize that creating anything meaningful and lasting requires an empowered team of informed, engaged individuals. As we advance in the years ahead, we are committed to the long-term growth and development of our employees. If we empower our employees with more information and the education to understand and apply that information and if we do this consistently, we will be successful by every measure. Locations Leadership Careers Partners Success Stories Social Responsibility Realizing employee potential through the achievement of client success About Us Redirect Locations Mission & Vision What drives us What we are driving towards What we do How we succeed To support every stakeholder in the pursuit of their full potential Realizing employee potential through the achievement of client success To improve industry by guiding our clients to increasingly resilient operations and safer communities. We succeed in critical fields that others avoid by remaining authentic to our core values. Results-Driven: Success Demands Tangible Results – We strive for excellence in all we do. Inclusive: Value From All – We encourage, seek out, and leverage the diversity in knowledge and perspective of all stakeholders, knowing the team delivers greater value than any individual. Relentless: Unwavering Commitment – We drive forward with passion and purpose. Locations Greenville, South Carolina aeSolutions Corporate Headquarters 250 Commonwealth Drive, Suite 200 Greenville, SC 29615 PO Box 26566 Greenville, SC 29616 Phone: 864-676-0600 Panel Fabrication Shop 124 Woodruff Industrial Lane Greenville, SC 29607 Houston Office 757 N Eldridge Parkway, Suite 520 Houston, Texas 77079 Phone: 713-292-0000

We would love to talk to you about a possible career with us. Every day, we work on problems that matter to industrial asset owners and to their local communities.  These are complex problems that are only overcome by having a great team. Careers at aeSolutions Working at aeSolutions > In business since 1998, aeSolutions is a consulting, engineering and systems integration company that provides industrial process safety and automation products and services. Every day, we work on problems that matter to industrial asset owners and to their local communities. These are complex problems that are only overcome by having a great team. We would love to talk to you about a possible career with us. Below are the current openings with aeSolutions: Important information about aeSolutions’ benefits, participation in E-Verify, and other Applicant Notices can be found here: Working at aeSolutions aeSolutions values the contributions of a diverse and inclusive workforce and is an Equal Employment Opportunity employer. This means we do not discriminate on the basis of actual or perceived race, creed, color, religion, national origin, ancestry, citizenship status, age, disability, sex, marital status, veteran status, uniformed services, sexual orientation, gender identity, genetic information, or any other characteristic protected by applicable federal, state, or local laws. Our management team is dedicated to this policy with respect to recruitment, hiring, placement, promotion, transfer, training, compensation, benefits, employee activities, and general treatment during employment. Access the “Know Your Rights” information from the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission here: Know Your Rights: Workplace Discrimination is Illegal. Consistent with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and state disability laws, it is the policy of aeSolutions to provide reasonable accommodation when requested by a qualified applicant or employee with a disability, unless such accommodation would cause an undue hardship. If reasonable accommodation is needed to participate in the job application or interview process, to perform essential job functions, and/or to receive other benefits and privileges of employment, please contact the HR Director at 864-404-3022 or resumes@aeSolutions.com Working at aeSolutions >

aeSolutions is a total process automation provider with extensive experience in turnkey solutions. We've earned aeSolutions was the first company in the Americas to earn Siemens’ PCS 7 Safety Specialist certification. ​aeSolutions' President, Ken O’Malley, holds a position on Siemens’ User Advisory Boar Siemens Solution Partner - aeSolutions aeSolutions is a process automation engineering company with extensive experience in delivering turnkey automation solutions and is a leading provider of critical systems such as Safety Instrumented Systems, Fire and Gas Systems, and Combustion Control and Safeguarding Systems in the country. The company maintains a team of experienced Professional Engineers and Certified Functional Safety Experts (CFSE). aeSolutions joined Siemens Solution Partner Program in 1999 and has earned the Solution Partner Specialist designation after achieving technical and commercial milestones associated with year-over-year quality performance delivering solutions in both brownfield migrations and greenfield expansions for over two decades. We're proud to have been the first company in the Americas to earn Siemens’ PCS 7 Safety Specialist certification. Siemens.com Partner Detail Page aeSolutions' President, Ken O’Malley , holds a position on Siemens’ User Advisory Board as well as Siemens’ national Solution Partner Council. Service Portfolio: Consulting for process safety and automation conceptual design Automation of process manufacturing facilities Training on PSM and process automation and safety systems Integration, Engineering, and Commissioning of DCS, SIS, BMS and fire & gas systems FM and UL certified panel fabrication shop Migrations & upgrades of automation & safety systems aeSolutions: Certificates: Solution Partner Process Control System SIMATIC PCS 7 Advanced Factory Automation PCS 7 Safety Specialist Systems Intergration - Automation Services Combustion - Burner Management Systems aeSolutions & Siemens Media aeSolutions is the First in Americas to earn S iemens SIMATIC PCS 7 Safety Specialist Certifications “As customers require PCS 7 safety instrumented systems, we can recommend aeSolutions, our certified Process Safety Specialist Solution Partner, knowing that they have the engineering and quality practices to execute the project right the first time using best practices,” says Rich Chmielewski, Siemens USA PCS 7 Solution Partner Program Manager. Learn More Using the cloud to secure the cloud https://www.controlglobal.com Best practices for gas detection system design https://www.controlglobal.com aeSolutions is First in the Americas to Earn Siemens SIMATIC PCS 7 Safety Specialist Certification https://www.automationworld.com aeSolutions & Siemens Case Studies Ammonia isolation and mitigation safety system based on FGS 1400 MK II platform. Uses S7-400 safety controllers and S7-300 safety IO. Ammonia suppression safety system that is NRTL approved for toxic gas. FGS 1400 MK II product provides leak detection, occupant notification, equipment isolation, and hazard suppression capability for a pressurized ammonia storage facility. View Details aeSolutions applies our expertise to help you produce Hydrogen safely. Expertise is required to produce hydrogen safely especially indoors with electrolyzers. You are working with a dangerous chemical and with modeling of the gas, especially indoors, you can properly place the detectors. Fire and Gas, Safety Shutdown systems as well as overall process automation best practices, are critical to safely product hydrogen. View Details Optimizing Integration of Life-Saving Gas Detection Systems for the Pharmaceutical Industry Leverage the expertise of Solution Partner aeSolutions to provide plants with turnkey gas detection systems including all control system components, detectors and computational fluid dynamics modeling. Benefits can include: •Ensures OSHA compliance to reduce risk of overexposure, fire or explosion •Simplified integration of gas detection systems into plants •Minimized footprint due to modern I/O technology View Details Siemens PCS7 Implemented as SI-BMS for Utility Boilers at Chemical Plant Designed, fabricated, configured, tested and performed start-up services for seven burner management systems (BMS) on seven coal and gas fired process boilers for a chemical manufacturing plant. View Details Fire & Gas Safety System using SIMATIC S7-400F provides highly scalable flexibility for industrial Fire and Gas applications. FM approved Fire and Gas safety system based on S7-400 safety controllers and ET200MF safety IO. System provides detection, notification, suppression, and process ESD shutdowns. System also has FM approved power supply system capable of supplying OSHA and NFPA 72 power requirements. View Details Meeting Customer Demand by Doubling Production PCS 7 Simatic Batch and PCS 7 Failsafe were used to automate a new reactor and associated equipment to double production View Details Safety Shutdown and BMS needs met with Compliant System Refineries burner management and safety shutdown needs are met with rack-to-rack redundant PCS 7 Failsafe System and Safety Matrix. View Details Siemens PCS 7 TIA Success: Instrumentation and Motor Control Centers as a Modular and Scalable Solution The SEFA Group plant gives a local supply of a premium recycled product available for sustainable construction. Siemens PCS 7 was successfully integrated using TIA with all instrumentation and motor control centers to aid in elimination of up to 400,000 tons of fly ash per year transported to landfills. This also improved reliability with PCS7 tools View Details www.usa.siemens.com/process