Our Stories

Have you felt buried under six feet of safety study recommendations that must be closed? Does it feel impossible to follow Recognized and Generally Accepted Good Engineering Practices (RAGAGEPs) to convert recommendations into engineered design reality? You are not alone.

Technical complexity is one of the most underestimated challenges in resolving PHA recommendations. What seems simple on paper often reveals layers of engineering coordination, system interdependencies, and feasibility hurdles, turning compliance into a multifaceted effort that requires planning, collaboration, and the right support.

Resource constraints are a common challenge in resolving PHA recommendations. Part 1 of this blog series explores how limited teams and tight funds impact compliance and safety and offers practical strategies to help facilities plan ahead, prioritize effectively, and stay on track.

Keep your facility safe and compliant — don’t let your PHA become a “check-the-box” task. Regular, well-executed PHA revalidations identify evolving risks and turn findings into action, ensuring lasting protection for your people, assets, and operations.

A systematically written document outlining the process safety elements and systems that apply at your facility.

Learn how facility siting can protect both personnel and assets by balancing risks, safety protocols, and operational requirements effective

Each foundational block includes the pillars that support the overall structure, including all of the PSM and RMP elements.

The 2nd edition of IEC 61511 now requires – by use of the word “shall” – that a Stage 4 Functional Safety Assessment (FSA) be conducted...

Industry Veteran to Lead Division Dedicated to Providing Top Tier Process Safety and Risk Management Solutions Greenville, SC –January...

How do you know if you have combustible dust hazards present? Screening and testing of a representative sample of the dust for the paramete